Environmental Review Workshop
Toggle Navigation
Review in Process for Rulemaking for Dam Safety and Water Way Management, Pennsylvania Environmental Quality Board. Comments are due 2-3-21. ____Review in process for: Proposed Rulemaking for Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations on the Outer Continental Shelf: Revisions to the Requirements for Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic Outer Continental Shelf, Department of the Interior acting through the Bureaus of Ocean Energy Management and Safety and Environmental Enforcement. Comments are due 2-8-21. ____Review in Process: Environmental Impact Statement, Caribou-Targhee National Forest and Curlew National Grassland Integrated Weed Management Analysis, Idaho. U.S. Forest Service. Comments are due 2-8-21. ____Review in Process: Proposed rulemaking, Texas, Proposed Approval of State Coal Combustion Residuals Permit Program, USEPA. Comments are due 2-8-21. ____Proposed Incidental Take Permit, Habitat Conservation Plan and Categorical Exclusion for the Threatened Grizzly Bear, BNSF Railroad, Montana; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Comments are Due 2-11-21. ____Review in Process: Proposed Rule Making for Coal Combustion Product Existing Structural Fills, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. Comments are due 2-15-21. ____Review in Process: Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan Regulations, Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Commercial Fishing Operations, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. Comments are due 3-1-21. ____Review in process for: Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Oil and Gas Lease Sale 258, Cook Inlet Planning Area, Alaska Outer Continental Shelf, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Department of the Interior. Comments are due 3-1-21. ____Review in process for: Notice of Intent to Issue NPDES Wastewater Discharge Permit #NC0000272 with Proposed Removal of Color Variance, Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc. dba Evergreen Packaging. Division of Water Resources, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. Comments are due 4-30-21.

Providing Technical Comments for Environmental Projects During Public Comment Periods

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Press Releases
  • Educational Articles
  • Directory of State Public Comment Periods
  • Directory of Federal Public Comment Periods
  • Directory of Public Comment Periods - International
  • COMMENTS PROVIDED FOR: Federal Agencies
  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • Delaware
  • Florida
  • Hawaii
  • Idaho
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Maryland
  • Michigan
  • Missouri
  • Montana
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • Ohio
  • Oklahoma
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Virginia
  • Washington
  • Wisconsin
  • Canada

Home

Boy With His Finger in the Dyke - the Heroism of Our Reviewers as Endangered Species' Last Line of Defense

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Written by Tom Price - Executive Director, B.S. Chemistry
Category: Educational Articles
Published: 28 January 2021
Created: 28 January 2021
Last Updated: 28 January 2021
Hits: 1

Tourism statue in the Netherlands, of the nameless boy plugging a dike

Photograph Attribution: user:Pieter1, CC BY-SA 3.0 <http://creativecommons.org/licen

 

After a long night of drafting technical comments, I felt my work was so important, like the last line of defense for protection of an Endangered Species, that I told a friend I felt like the boy with his finger in the dyke.

Most of us know the famous story of the boy in Holland who happened to be walking by a dam and noticed that a leak had sprung: “…a slight noise like the trickling of water upon pebbles, attracted his attention…the water was flowing. …the boy saw that the water must soon enlarge the hole through which it was now only drooping, and that utter and general ruin would be the consequence of the inundation of the country that must follow.

He climbed from stone to stone till he reached the hole, and to put his finger into it, was the work of a moment, and to his delight he finds that he has succeeded in stopping the flow of the water. This was all very well for a little while, and the child thought only of the success of his device. But the night was closing in, and with the night came the cold.

The little boy looked around in vain. No one came. He shouted – he called loudly – no one answered. He resolved to stay there all night, but alas! The cold was becoming every moment more biting, and the poor finger fixed in the hold began to feel benumbed, and the numbness soon extended to the hand, and thence throughout the whole arm. The pain became still greater, still harder to bear, but still the boy moved not. Tears roiled down his cheeks as he thought of his father, of his mother, of his little bed, where he might now be sleeping so soundly; but still the little fellow stirred not, for he knew that did he remove the small slender finger which he had opposed to the escape of the water, not only would he himself be drowned, but his father, his brothers, his neighbours – nay the whole village.

We know not what faltering of purpose, what momentary failures of courage there might have been during that long and terrible night; but certain it is, that at day-break he was found in the same painful position. A clergyman discovered a child seated on a stone, writing from pain, and with pale face and tearful eyes. ‘In the name of wonder boy”, he exclaimed, ‘what are you doing there?’ ‘I am hindering the water from running out.’ was the answer, in perfect simplicity of the child, who during that whole night, had been evincing such heroic fortitude and undaunted courage." From The Little Hero of Haarlem, Van Court’s New Monthly Magazine (1850).

Just like the little hero of our story, we know not what faltering of purpose, what momentary failures of courage might befall our reviewers but certain it is, when the comments are due they are submitted. Thinking only of their device to provide hard-hitting comments, our reviewers evince the same heroic fortitude and undaunted courage to “hinder the water from running out.” for protection of human health, the environment, and conservation of Endangered Species.

Search


  • Forgot your username?
  • Forgot your password?

Collaborative Reviews Document Management System: ONLYOFFICE
We Use ONLYOFFICE™ Online Office
Click here to go to ITRC.org

Back to Top

© 2021 Environmental Review Workshop